FCC Rejects Net Neutrality

Today the FCC voted 3-2 to allow AT&T to block your access to third-party web applications. This is a bit like the water company forcing you to buy all new cups, pots, pans and faucets from them in order to turn on your tap. This is bad.

Do you believe in free markets?
Image having to pay for access to substandard code when superior open-source is available for free. This move disables free markets while ironically claiming to support net neutrality.
Do you believe in small business?

Imagine not being able to provide high quality web applications and plug-ins to your clients because you are too small to afford a resale license for what you can write yourself. This move shuts down an entire part of our industry and delivers it to the biggest phone and cable companies in the country. As Chomsky said, more or less, “This is how it works: free market discipline for small business, nanny state for big business.”

Please learn more, sign this petitionblock further consolidation, and spread the word.

A repost of today’s Huffington Post article explaining why this is scary is below:

FCC breaks Obama’s promise, allows corporate censorship online with fake Net Neutrality

Minutes ago, the FCC passed new rules — written by corporations — that will end Net Neutrality. For the first time in history, the U.S. government approved corporate censorship of the Internet, putting the future of online free speech at risk. Unbelievably, the person leading the charge was Obama appointee Julius Genachowski (known in some circles as Judas GenaComcast for his historic sellout and notorious industry-friendly attitude).

These rules also violate President Obama’s campaign promise to protect Net Neutrality and appoint an FCC Commissioner who would do the same, but some media are reporting the corporate spin that this is a “Net Neutrality compromise.” The White House is trying to convince us this isn’t a sellout as well with their wholly supportive statement.

This is not a compromise and it doesn’t fulfill Obama’s campaign promise — not even close. There’s no such thing as half a First Amendment and no such thing as prohibiting “some” corporate censorship. In reality, these rules are what Senator Al Franken said they are:

The FCC’s action today is simply inadequate to protect consumers or preserve the free and open Internet. I am particularly disappointed to learn that the order will not specifically ban paid prioritization, allowing big companies to pay for a fast lane on the Internet and abandoning the foundation of net neutrality. The rule also contains almost no protections for mobile broadband service, remaining silent on the blocking of content, applications, and devices. Wireless technology is the future of the Internet, and for many rural Minnesotans, it’s often the only choice for broadband.

Today was another historic sellout to big corporations by the Obama administration, not some kind of “win.” We need to set the record straight.I’ve put together a page with three clear reasons why today’s rules are a sellout, allow corporate censorship, and end the Internet as we know it. I’ve also copied them below. Can you share this page with our friends so we can get the word out?

If you’re on Twitter, please click to share this: NEWS: @FCC breaks Obama promise, allows corporate censorship – no Net Neutrality rules. 3 things to know: http://bit.ly/eVKyWH @WhiteHouse

If you’re on Facebookclick here to spread the word.

Here’s why today’s rules are nothing but a sop to big business:

  1. Corporate censorship is allowed on your phone: The rules passed today by Obama FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski absurdly create different corporate censorship rules for wired and wireless Internet, allowing big corporations like Comcast to block websites they don’t like on your phone — a clear failure to fulfill Net Neutrality and put you, the consumer, in control of what you can and can’t do online.
  2. Online tollbooths are allowed, destroying innovation: The rules passed today would allow big Internet Service Providers like Verizon and Comcast to charge for access to the “fast lane.” Big companies that could afford to pay these fees like Google or Amazon would get their websites delivered to consumers quickly, while independent newspapers, bloggers, innovators, and small businesses would see their sites languish in the slow lane, destroying a level playing field for competition online and clearly violating Net Neutrality.
  3. The rules allow corporations to create “public” and “private” Internets, destroying the one Internet as we know it: For the first time, these rules would embrace a “public Internet” for regular people vs. a “private Internet” with all the new innovations for corporations who pay more — ending the Internet as we know it and creating tiers of free speech and innovation, accessible only if you have pockets deep enough to pay off the corporations.

The FCC could have reclassified Internet as a communications service — reversing a Bush-era mistake — regulated greedy corporations like Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T with enforceable rules, and protected free speech online. But they didn’t — instead, they allowed these corporations to write their own rules.It’s imperative the FCC’s action today isn’t seen as a “win” for Net Neutrality — the Internet is still unprotected from corporate abuse and we still have to fight until we truly win. So help us spread the word.

If you’re on Twitter, please click to share this: NEWS: @FCC breaks Obama promise, allows corporate censorship – no Net Neutrality rules. 3 things to know: http://bit.ly/eVKyWH @WhiteHouse

If you’re on Facebookclick here to spread the word.

About

A typographic, designological, visulicious extravaganza!

Posted in Action!, Editorial, Repost From Cited Source